Small spacecraft, such as Voyager 1, have traveled more than 138 AU from our planet since launching, with the goal of discovering what interstellar space may have in store. We’ve put boots on the moon. If Americans do not go to Mars, someone else will. There are plans in the works to put boots on Mars in this generation. Humans should go to Mars to slowly work towards building a civilization there, according to Digital Trends. And that spells political and economic benefit for whoever succeeds. Space exploration invokes the interest of many. There also can be more resources for us and probably even new resources. But what about the good reasons not to go to Mars? Overpopulation and limited resources on Earth makes Mars a potentially suitable place to colonize.

Everyone is always going on about the myriad of good reasons to send humans to Mars. Evidence suggests that Mars was once full of water, warmer and had a thicker atmosphere, offering a potentially habitable environment. In particular, space radiation, especially galactic cosmic rays (GCRs), is dangerous. Mars is an excellent place to investigate this question because it is the most similar planet to Earth in the Solar System. Also we could take better care for mars and not pollute it like Earth. Searching for life on Mars Understanding whether life existed elsewhere in the Universe beyond Earth is a fundamental question of humankind. Understanding the origin of life wouldn´t help as many people as the technological innovation from a Martian colony would. I think we should go to mars because, if there is a mission to mars we would be able to learn more about mars. Going to mars is worth the risk. However, sending people to Mars for long periods of time would be extremely unsafe, and we shouldn’t do it. In the second instalment of his two-part feature on human missions to Mars, Dr Alexander Kumar asks whether we should send people to the Red Planet given our poor record managing this one. Pro: Discovering New Life One monumental discovery scientists could make is determining whether life currently exists on Mars. Besides earth life if far superior to martian life (if it exists) we should just let natural selection take over on mars and maybe the planet would go green rather than red. Scientist Stephen Hawking claims that humans need to colonize planets in the next 1,000 years to ensure survival.

Pros of the Mission to Mars Humans on Mars can study geological evolution and look for signs of life The successful launch of the Mars mission could lead to travel between planets much more common in the scientific and possibly the public world The challenge of going to Mars will. The Pros and Cons of Going to Mars 1358 Words 6 Pages Negative and Positive Aspects of Going to Mars Whether it’s Lewis and Clark or Joe Schmoe, humans have always had a … British doctor Alexander Kumar wrote that in a 2012 article for BBC News where he explored the pros and cons of sending humans to Mars. The possibility of finding life in extraterrestrial space leaves us mystified. The pros and cons of space exploration let us explore the final frontier that we currently know. We may not like what we find. Pros and Cons of a Manned Mission to Mars Demarcus Briers November 27, 2011 75,973 Views Much like the bold journey of Marco Polo and company to the unknown worlds of East Asia, NASA is set to embark upon a 21 month manned mission to the surface of Mars by 2030. Certain Microbes are able to withstand harsh conditions, such as those thriving in arid, cold, salty environments and those exposed to intense UV Here are a couple: ----- 1. For one thing, space is a very hazardous place for humans. CROSS-CONTAMINATION FROM EARTH It's always a concern when sending surface probes to pristine worlds such as Mars that we may inadvertently send a bunch of hitchhikers as well—that is, a whole gang of hardy microbes. While some believe that space travel and research in the field has advantages, there are others who criticize the field for having no real benefit for mankind. What are the pros and cons of space exploration? Such as if humans can live there. Instead of spending the money for space researches, they can use the money to reduce the poverty in some of the underdeveloped nations. “We are not going to go to the moon or Mars because of population pressure,” he explained. When the Voyagers were sent out into space in 1977, there were golden records placed on the spacecraft to communicate with other life about our own species. Carl Sagan compared the act to throwing a message in a bottle in the ocean.